The use of invasive techniques and the sacrifice of animals in psychological research

Kant believed his anthropocentric philosophy provided the moral tradition and contemporary thought of his society; it was a philosophical underpinning, rather than an abstraction distant from the thoughts and feelings of the ordinary man [ 29 ].

Animals feel pain and fear just as we do. Cruelty to animals was nevertheless condemned by Aquinas, as it could lead humans to develop feelings and actions of cruelty towards other humans.

Yes Scientists have been able to advance their knowledge of human and animal health and disease dramatically by studying model organisms. The belief amongst ancient Greek physicians that nature could be understood by means of exploration and experiment—and the medical knowledge thus obtained to be of clinical relevance in practice—would be replaced by other schools of medical thought.

These may involve the use of animal models of diseases or conditions, which are often discovered or generated by pure research programmes. Certain domestic and wild animals have a natural propensity or predisposition for certain conditions that are also found in humans.

animal testing is bad

Over 20, rabbits were used for animal testing in the UK in The five categories are "sub-threshold", "mild", "moderate", "severe" and "non-recovery", the latter being procedures in which an animal is anesthetized and subsequently killed without recovering consciousness. Through testing on animals we are able to ensure any risks of a drug are identified and minimised before it is tested on humans during clinical trials.

Most notably, the Empiric school 3rd century BCE—4th century would reject the study of anatomy and physiology by dissection of cadavers or by vivisection, not only on the grounds of cruelty and the established taboos, but also for its uselessness.

Rated 6/10 based on 22 review
Should animals be used in research?